Comparison

tene vs HashiCorp Vault

HashiCorp Vault is the gold standard for enterprise server-side secrets. tene is the local-first CLI for developer machines and AI-editor safety.

Star on GitHub

HashiCorp Vault is the incumbent enterprise secret manager. It handles dynamic secrets, PKI, transit encryption, and policy-driven access at production scale. It is also expensive to run, complex to operate, and wildly overkill for the individual developer workflow.

tene doesn't compete with Vault on Vault's turf. If you already run Vault for production server-side secrets, keep it. tene solves a different problem: encrypted secrets on the developer's workstation that stay out of AI-editor context windows. Run both — they don't conflict.

They solve different problems

Vault is a production secrets service: policies, audit logs, dynamic leases, and integrations with every major infrastructure layer. If you need AWS IAM credentials that expire in 15 minutes, Vault is the answer.

tene is a developer-workstation and CI tool: encrypted .env replacement, runtime env-var injection, AI-editor safety. If you want your API keys to stay out of Claude Code's context window, tene is the answer. Neither replaces the other.

Side-by-side

Feature-by-feature comparison. Every row is sourced from the official docs of each product — if you find something stale, open an issue.

DimensionteneHashiCorp Vault
Target audienceIndividual developers + small teams + AI workflowsPlatform / SRE / security teams in mid-to-large enterprises
InfrastructureNone (CLI only)HA cluster, storage backend, unseal workflow, PKI, audit backends
PriceFree (MIT)Free (Vault OSS) to $1,000+ / month for Vault Enterprise HA
Dynamic secretsNo (long-lived secrets only)Yes — best-in-class (DB, cloud, PKI, SSH)
AI-editor integrationAuto-generates CLAUDE.md, .cursor/rules/tene.mdc, .windsurfrules, GEMINI.md, AGENTS.mdNone
EncryptionXChaCha20-Poly1305 + Argon2idAES-GCM + Shamir unseal / KMS auto-unseal
ScaleSingle developer / small teamThousands of clients, millions of leases
Operational complexityInstall binary + `tene init`Cluster ops, seal/unseal, backup, upgrade procedures
Open sourceMITVault OSS is BUSL 1.1 (source-available, not OSI-approved)

The common pattern: use both

Production services read from Vault (dynamic DB creds, rotating API keys, short-lived cloud credentials). Developer machines use tene for the local developer loop: storing the handful of long-lived secrets (Stripe, OpenAI, webhook keys) that make local dev work, keeping them encrypted, and keeping AI editors from reading them.

A common pattern: `vault kv get -format=json` to bootstrap local secrets from Vault, pipe into `tene import`. Developers then `tene run --` their local stack.

When NOT to use tene

If your secret rotation policy is measured in minutes, you need dynamic secrets, or you have a compliance team that requires audit-log-everything: use Vault. tene is intentionally not a replacement for that.

FAQ

Why no comparison table for dynamic secrets?
+
Because tene doesn't have them, and it would be misleading to compare. Vault's dynamic secret engines (AWS, database, SSH, PKI) are in a different category — tene focuses on long-lived developer secrets + runtime injection.
Can tene bootstrap secrets from Vault?
+
Yes, via a shell pipeline: `vault kv get -format=json secret/myapp | jq -r '.data.data | to_entries[] | "\(.key)=\(.value)"' | tee .env && tene import .env && rm .env`. This gives your local dev environment the current production secrets without running Vault locally.
Is tene a replacement for Vault?
+
No. Vault is the right tool for production server-side secret management. tene is the right tool for developer-workstation + AI-editor workflows. They're complements.
What about audit logs?
+
tene's CLI emits local history. Optional cloud audit logs are on the roadmap for Pro (at app.tene.sh). If you need certified audit logs today, stay on Vault.